Mountain West Conference Volleyball

           
Preseason Polls and the Final Standings
1999 - 2009
2009 MWC Preseason Poll and Final Standings Preseason Team (1st votes) Final Standings 1. Utah (8) 3 2. Colorado State (4) 1 3. New Mexico (3) 3 4. BYU (2) 5 5. TCU 2 6. UNLV 7 7. San Diego State 6 8. Wyoming 8 9. Air Force 9 The sum of the differences between preseason and final rankings is 9. The correlation coefficient is 0.86281.
2008 MWC Preseason Poll and Final Standings Preseason Team (1st votes) Final Standings 1. Colorado State (13) 2 2. Utah 1 3. BYU (1) 6 4. New Mexico 3 5. UNLV 4 6. TCU 4 7. San Diego State 7 8. Wyoming 8 9. Air Force 9 The sum of the differences between preseason and final rankings is 9. The correlation coefficient is 0.86032.
2007 MWC Preseason Poll and Final Standings Preseason Team (1st votes) Final Standings 1. BYU (8) 2 2. Colorado State (5) 1 3. Utah 4 4. UNLV (1) 2 5. New Mexico 6 6. San Diego State 8 7. Wyoming 7 8. TCU 4 9. Air Force 9 The sum of the differences between preseason and final rankings is 12. The correlation coefficient is 0.7813.
2006 MWC Preseason Poll and Final Standings Preseason Team (1st votes) Final Standings 1. BYU (6) 2 2. Utah (6) 1 3. Colorado State (2) 3 4. UNLV 4 5. Wyoming 5 5. San Diego State 6 7. New Mexico 6 8. TCU 6 9. Air Force 9 The sum of the differences between preseason and final rankings is 6. The correlation coefficient is 0.93417.
2005 MWC Preseason Poll and Final Standings Preseason Team (1st votes) Final Standings 1. BYU (7) 1 2. Utah (3) 3 3. Colorado State (3) 2 4. UNLV 4 5. TCU 8 6. San Diego State 5 7. Wyoming 6 8. New Mexico 7 9. Air Force 9 The sum of the differences between preseason and final rankings is 8. The correlation coefficient is 0.88333.
2004 MWC Preseason Poll and Final Standings Preseason Team (1st votes) Final Standings 1. Colorado State (14) 1 2. BYU 3 3. Utah (1) 1 4. San Diego State 6 5. Wyoming 5 6. UNLV 4 7. New Mexico 7 8. Air Force 8 The sum of the differences between preseason and final rankings is 7. The correlation coefficient is 0.85858.
2003 MWC Preseason Poll and Final Standings Preseason Team (1st votes) Final Standings 1. Utah (5) 2 2. Colorado State (2) 1 3. BYU 3 4. San Diego State (1) 4 5. UNLV 5 6. Wyoming 5 7. New Mexico 8 8. Air Force 5 The sum of the differences between preseason and final rankings is 7. The correlation coefficient is 0.84772.
2002 MWC Preseason Poll and Final Standings Preseason Team (1st votes) Final Standings 1. Utah (6) 3 2. Colorado State (1) 1 3. BYU (1) 4 4. San Diego State (1) 2 5. UNLV 5 6. Wyoming 6 7. New Mexico 7 8. Air Force 8 The sum of the differences between preseason and final rankings is 6. The correlation coefficient is 0.88095.
2001 MWC Preseason Poll and Final Standings Preseason Team (1st votes) Final Standings 1. BYU (5) 3 2. Colorado State (3) 1 3. Utah 2 4. San Diego State 4 5. UNLV 5 6. New Mexico 7 7. Wyoming 6 8. Air Force 8 The sum of the differences between preseason and final rankings is 6. The correlation coefficient is 0.90476.
2000 MWC Preseason Poll and Final Standings Preseason Team (1st votes) Final Standings 1. Colorado State (4) 1 1. BYU (4) 2 3. Utah 3 4. San Diego State 4 4. UNLV 5 6. New Mexico 5 7. Wyoming 7 8. Air Force 8 The sum of the differences between preseason and final rankings is 3. The correlation coefficient is 0.9708.
1999 MWC Preseason Poll and Final Standings Preseason Team (1st votes) Final Standings 1. BYU 1 1. Colorado State 2 3. Utah 3 4. UNLV 6 5. Wyoming 8 6. New Mexico 4 7. San Diego State 6 8. Air Force 4 The sum of the differences between preseason and final rankings is 13. The correlation coefficient is 0.59592.